Skip to main content

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced today that it will ban the use of Red dye No. 3. This synthetic dye is responsible for the vibrant cherry red color in foods and beverages and has been associated with cancer in animal studies. Here’s a round up of the reaction to this important announcement.

Red Dye No.3 is used in thousands of foods

Red dye No. 3 has been a topic of heated debate for decades, with mounting evidence pointing to its potential health risks.

Despite this,  the dye is still used in thousands of foods all over the world. These include candy, cereals,  cherries in fruit cocktails and strawberry-flavored milkshakes.

Years of research and lobbying on Red Dye No. 3 pays off

The FDA’s decision to ban red dye No. 3 follows years of scientific research and advocacy from consumer health groups, including  the Center for Science in the Public Interest, Environmental Working Group (EWG) and the California Assembly’s Committee on Health.  Incidently, California  banned red dye No. 3 and other substances in 2023.

Red 3 was banned in cosmetics and topical drugs in 1990

Quoting the Center for Science in the Public Interest,  “In 1990, the Food and Drug Administration banned Red 3 from use in cosmetics, like lipstick and skincare products, as well as topical drugs, like pain-relief ointments.

“That’s because the FDA learned in the 1980s that Red 3 is a carcinogen in rats. Federal law requires that the FDA prohibit the use of any cancer-causing color additives in foods, drugs, and cosmetics. In 1990, the agency banned Red 3 for topical uses, but the FDA decided (and promised) to take separate regulatory action to ban Red 3 from the food supply and other oral products.”

“More than three decades elapsed, and the FDA never took those critical next steps, failing to keep its promise and, more importantly, failing to protect consumers from this clearly unsafe additive. Red 3 can still be found in thousands of candies, snacks, and fruit products. ”

A concerted effort by health activist groups to get Red 3 banned in food

EWG noted in its press release  that EWG, the Center for Science in the Public Interest, the Center for Food Safety and other public health groups petitioned the FDA to ban red dye No. 3 back in 2022.

Red 3 is known to cause cancer in animals and has been banned in cosmetics since 1990. 

EWG President and co-Founder Ken Cook  told media, “We wouldn’t be celebrating this historic decision today without the relentless leadership of public health champions like Michael Jacobson and others who took up this fight decades ago on behalf of consumers,” said

“We all owe a debt of gratitude to Michael and the other early leaders who pushed the FDA to remove toxic chemical ingredients from the nation’s food supply,” Cook said.

Jacobson, who co-founded CSPI in 1971, has been a leading advocate in tackling the underlying causes of preventable diseases. He has been championing a just and sustainable food system that makes healthy, nutritious options accessible to all.

Still more to be done

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator at the  McCullough Foundation said in his newsletter, “This ban was LONG overdue. Unfortunately, there are still other synthetic food dyes that have also been linked to serious deleterious health effects still remain on the market.”

“A few months ago, I summarized the harm linked to synthetic food dyes — outdated FDA standards expose Americans to toxic food dyes linked to cancer, neurobehavioral issues, and other health risks, demanding urgent regulatory action: delays, and behavioral changes.”

FDA issues a deadline

Food manufacturers will have until Jan. 15, 2027 to reformulate their products. Companies that make ingested drugs, such as dietary supplements, will get an additional year.

Main Photo credit

Photo by Tima Miroshnichenko:

Read other articles on Longevity Live.

California Bans Food Additives Over Safety Concerns

 

 

 

 

Em Sloane

Em Sloane

I am an introverted nature lover, and long time contributor to LongevityLive.com. My role is to publish the information in a consumer friendly format, which we receive on the latest medical news, press releases and general information on the latest longevity related research findings.

Longevity Live is a digital publisher AND DOES NOT OFFER PERSONAL HEALTH OR MEDICAL ADVICE. IF YOU’RE FACING A MEDICAL EMERGENCY, CALL YOUR LOCAL EMERGENCY SERVICES IMMEDIATELY, OR VISIT THE NEAREST EMERGENCY ROOM OR URGENT CARE CENTER. YOU SHOULD CONSULT YOUR HEALTHCARE PROVIDER BEFORE STARTING ANY NUTRITION, DIET, EXERCISE, FITNESS, MEDICAL, OR WELLNESS PROGRAM.

This content, developed through collaboration with licensed medical professionals and external contributors, including text, graphics, images, and other material contained on the website, apps, newsletter, and products (“Content”), is general in nature and for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice; the Content is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.

Always consult your doctor or other qualified healthcare provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition, procedure, or treatment, whether it is a prescription medication, over-the-counter drug, vitamin, supplement, or herbal alternative.

Longevity Live makes no guarantees about the efficacy or safety of products or treatments described in any of our posts. Any information on supplements, related services and drug information contained in our posts are subject to change and are not intended to cover all possible uses, directions, precautions, warnings, drug interactions, allergic reactions, or adverse effects.

Longevity does not recommend or endorse any specific test, clinician, clinical care provider, product, procedure, opinion, service, or other information that may be mentioned on Longevity’s websites, apps, and Content.

Leave a Reply

error: Content is protected !!